Comments on: Arggggg! http://www.symphonious.net/2004/03/11/arggggg/ Living in a state of accord. Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:16:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: hammett http://www.symphonious.net/2004/03/11/arggggg/comment-page-1/#comment-51 hammett Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=45#comment-51 Dude, you can say you hate C#, not .Net. .Net is not a language. Dude, you can say you hate C#, not .Net. .Net is not a language.

]]> By: Tahir Hashmi http://www.symphonious.net/2004/03/11/arggggg/comment-page-1/#comment-52 Tahir Hashmi Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=45#comment-52 Thanks for the criticism. I just updated the content of the article to include a large section called "C++ Goodies" that takes about 50% of the article's size. The ranting has been pushed toward the end of the article. Hope that the article would be more useful now. I too have programmed in several of the languages you mentioned but things like XSLT or Prolog don't compete with C++ in functionality, so there is no point comparing them. I would be grateful if you highlighted the incorrect statements. Thanks and have a nice day! Thanks for the criticism. I just updated the content of the article to include a large section called “C++ Goodies” that takes about 50% of the article’s size. The ranting has been pushed toward the end of the article. Hope that the article would be more useful now.

I too have programmed in several of the languages you mentioned but things like XSLT or Prolog don’t compete with C++ in functionality, so there is no point comparing them.

I would be grateful if you highlighted the incorrect statements.

Thanks and have a nice day!

]]> By: Manish Jethani http://www.symphonious.net/2004/03/11/arggggg/comment-page-1/#comment-53 Manish Jethani Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=45#comment-53 I'm one of the guys who linked to that article, so you can give up reading my blog :P :) <a href="http://www.livejournal.com/users/mannu/131085.html">http://www.livejournal.com/users/mannu/131085.html</a> I actually agree with what you're saying and it's in fact a very good way of putting it. I'm going to use this blog entry as a reference while explaining to people what I've always believed in: There's no language good for all problems; it's about choosing the right tool for the job. Thanks! I’m one of the guys who linked to that article, so you can give up reading my blog :P :)

http://www.livejournal.com/users/mannu/131085.html

I actually agree with what you’re saying and it’s in fact a very good way of putting it. I’m going to use this blog entry as a reference while explaining to people what I’ve always believed in: There’s no language good for all problems; it’s about choosing the right tool for the job.

Thanks!

]]> By: Manish Jethani's Blog http://www.symphonious.net/2004/03/11/arggggg/comment-page-1/#comment-54 Manish Jethani's Blog Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=45#comment-54 <strong>Eckel on Java (and C#) generics</strong> While I agree wholeheartedly with the view that one should simply use the right tool for the job at hand, at another level, I believe programming languages should be compared because that's the natural way for them to evolve—the best features making it... Eckel on Java (and C#) generics

While I agree wholeheartedly with the view that one should simply use the right tool for the job at hand, at another level, I believe programming languages should be compared because that’s the natural way for them to evolve—the best features making it…

]]>