<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JavaScript Fun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.symphonious.net/2004/03/18/javascript-fun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2004/03/18/javascript-fun/</link>
	<description>Living in a state of accord.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Symphonious &#187; More JavaScript Fun</title>
		<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2004/03/18/javascript-fun/#comment-24572</link>
		<dc:creator>Symphonious &#187; More JavaScript Fun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=54#comment-24572</guid>
		<description>[...] Quite some time ago I talked about redefining and rewriting&#160;handler functions in JavaScript, but what if you want to add or redefine methods in an existing class? JavaScript classes1 are based on prototyping so the model is somewhat different to actual object oriented languages. Here&#39;s one way to define a class, MyThing: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quite some time ago I talked about redefining and rewriting&#160;handler functions in JavaScript, but what if you want to add or redefine methods in an existing class? JavaScript classes1 are based on prototyping so the model is somewhat different to actual object oriented languages. Here&#39;s one way to define a class, MyThing: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Gutierrez</title>
		<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2004/03/18/javascript-fun/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Gutierrez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=54#comment-59</guid>
		<description>1) Doh!  :^o

2) My point really was that you had to assign a function, and using the function keyword made that explicit. I didn't slow down enough to see that it was redundant.

3) Nice post on how to use functions an eval!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Doh!  :^o</p>
<p>2) My point really was that you had to assign a function, and using the function keyword made that explicit. I didn&#8217;t slow down enough to see that it was redundant.</p>
<p>3) Nice post on how to use functions an eval!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Sutton</title>
		<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2004/03/18/javascript-fun/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Sutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=54#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Alan,
Your code was actually quite good, my comments came out sounding harsher than I intended.  Probably should have been "not the simplest solution" rather than "overly complicated".

Mostly I just wanted to play around with JavaScript and it's funky everything's kinda sorta a string kind of philosophy.  It was about time I put something code related in this blog.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan,<br />
Your code was actually quite good, my comments came out sounding harsher than I intended.  Probably should have been &#8220;not the simplest solution&#8221; rather than &#8220;overly complicated&#8221;.</p>
<p>Mostly I just wanted to play around with JavaScript and it&#8217;s funky everything&#8217;s kinda sorta a string kind of philosophy.  It was about time I put something code related in this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
