<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Java&#8217;s Code is Available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.symphonious.net/2004/03/26/javas-code-is-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2004/03/26/javas-code-is-available/</link>
	<description>Living in a state of accord.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keith Lea</title>
		<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2004/03/26/javas-code-is-available/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Lea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=65#comment-67</guid>
		<description>It's easy to look at the code and modify it, but it's not as easy to actually test that code. You need to mess with bootclasspaths and things like that. And even if you do submit patches, you can't include patched versions of JDK classes in your application, nor can you distribute your patches. No one could create a "development version" of the JDK that included other people's patches, and that could be distributed for use with other applications.

I think Scott's response to IBM was silly, since (1) IBM offered to release the source to their JVM, and (2) Sun doesn't make money off of the JDK like IBM does from DB2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s easy to look at the code and modify it, but it&#8217;s not as easy to actually test that code. You need to mess with bootclasspaths and things like that. And even if you do submit patches, you can&#8217;t include patched versions of JDK classes in your application, nor can you distribute your patches. No one could create a &#8220;development version&#8221; of the JDK that included other people&#8217;s patches, and that could be distributed for use with other applications.</p>
<p>I think Scott&#8217;s response to IBM was silly, since (1) IBM offered to release the source to their JVM, and (2) Sun doesn&#8217;t make money off of the JDK like IBM does from DB2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Vernum</title>
		<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2004/03/26/javas-code-is-available/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Vernum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=65#comment-68</guid>
		<description>So, care to enlighten me as to how open sourcing java will magically make it easier to test your patches?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, care to enlighten me as to how open sourcing java will magically make it easier to test your patches?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
