<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unsigned Drivers Are Not A Security Hole</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.symphonious.net/2005/08/17/unsigned-drivers-are-not-a-security-hole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2005/08/17/unsigned-drivers-are-not-a-security-hole/</link>
	<description>Living in a state of accord.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David 'Zanchey' Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2005/08/17/unsigned-drivers-are-not-a-security-hole/#comment-7290</link>
		<dc:creator>David 'Zanchey' Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symphonious.net/2005/08/17/unsigned-drivers-are-not-a-security-hole/#comment-7290</guid>
		<description>(Arrived through Planet LCA.)

I believe that a defence of Chen's nomenclature can be constructed, but I agree with you that it probably isn't a major security bug (and this hasn't really been raised on his blog).

Windows 2003 Server refuses to provide an easy way out because it's a -server- operating system. It's supposed to be -stable-. "Sure guys, just go ahead and install any old kernel-mode stuff you want to."

I guess the WHQL stuff is a bit like the taint warnings on Linux kernels - a 'You have been warned' step.

As to fixing it, I assume you've checked System Properties (Hardware -&#62; Driver Signing) for this sort of thing. If that doesn't work, devcon (from Microsoft) might be worth a shot - issuing a devcon update command generally overrides all sanity checks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Arrived through Planet LCA.)</p>
<p>I believe that a defence of Chen&#8217;s nomenclature can be constructed, but I agree with you that it probably isn&#8217;t a major security bug (and this hasn&#8217;t really been raised on his blog).</p>
<p>Windows 2003 Server refuses to provide an easy way out because it&#8217;s a -server- operating system. It&#8217;s supposed to be -stable-. &#8220;Sure guys, just go ahead and install any old kernel-mode stuff you want to.&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess the WHQL stuff is a bit like the taint warnings on Linux kernels - a &#8216;You have been warned&#8217; step.</p>
<p>As to fixing it, I assume you&#8217;ve checked System Properties (Hardware -&gt; Driver Signing) for this sort of thing. If that doesn&#8217;t work, devcon (from Microsoft) might be worth a shot - issuing a devcon update command generally overrides all sanity checks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
