<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Unsigned Drivers Are Not A Security Hole</title> <atom:link href="http://www.symphonious.net/2005/08/17/unsigned-drivers-are-not-a-security-hole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.symphonious.net/2005/08/17/unsigned-drivers-are-not-a-security-hole/</link> <description>Living in a state of accord.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:07:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: David 'Zanchey' Adam</title><link>http://www.symphonious.net/2005/08/17/unsigned-drivers-are-not-a-security-hole/comment-page-1/#comment-7290</link> <dc:creator>David 'Zanchey' Adam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:06:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.symphonious.net/2005/08/17/unsigned-drivers-are-not-a-security-hole/#comment-7290</guid> <description>(Arrived through Planet LCA.)
I believe that a defence of Chen&#039;s nomenclature can be constructed, but I agree with you that it probably isn&#039;t a major security bug (and this hasn&#039;t really been raised on his blog).
Windows 2003 Server refuses to provide an easy way out because it&#039;s a -server- operating system. It&#039;s supposed to be -stable-. &quot;Sure guys, just go ahead and install any old kernel-mode stuff you want to.&quot;
I guess the WHQL stuff is a bit like the taint warnings on Linux kernels - a &#039;You have been warned&#039; step.
As to fixing it, I assume you&#039;ve checked System Properties (Hardware -&gt; Driver Signing) for this sort of thing. If that doesn&#039;t work, devcon (from Microsoft) might be worth a shot - issuing a devcon update command generally overrides all sanity checks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Arrived through Planet LCA.)</p><p>I believe that a defence of Chen&#8217;s nomenclature can be constructed, but I agree with you that it probably isn&#8217;t a major security bug (and this hasn&#8217;t really been raised on his blog).</p><p>Windows 2003 Server refuses to provide an easy way out because it&#8217;s a -server- operating system. It&#8217;s supposed to be -stable-. &#8220;Sure guys, just go ahead and install any old kernel-mode stuff you want to.&#8221;</p><p>I guess the WHQL stuff is a bit like the taint warnings on Linux kernels &#8211; a &#8216;You have been warned&#8217; step.</p><p>As to fixing it, I assume you&#8217;ve checked System Properties (Hardware -&gt; Driver Signing) for this sort of thing. If that doesn&#8217;t work, devcon (from Microsoft) might be worth a shot &#8211; issuing a devcon update command generally overrides all sanity checks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
