<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Wikis Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.symphonious.net/2005/11/29/making-wikis-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2005/11/29/making-wikis-work/</link>
	<description>Living in a state of accord.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Symphonious &#187; Wikipatterns.com</title>
		<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2005/11/29/making-wikis-work/#comment-59113</link>
		<dc:creator>Symphonious &#187; Wikipatterns.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symphonious.net/2005/11/29/making-wikis-work/#comment-59113</guid>
		<description>[...] a spot for it, but given my obvious bias I&#39;m concerned it would just look like spam. I&#39;ve previously hinted at our success in adopting a wiki by integrating our editor&#160;(we started off just using wiki [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a spot for it, but given my obvious bias I&#39;m concerned it would just look like spam. I&#39;ve previously hinted at our success in adopting a wiki by integrating our editor&#160;(we started off just using wiki [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Symphonious &#187; Scoble Wants a Wiki</title>
		<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2005/11/29/making-wikis-work/#comment-26789</link>
		<dc:creator>Symphonious &#187; Scoble Wants a Wiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 07:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symphonious.net/2005/11/29/making-wikis-work/#comment-26789</guid>
		<description>[...] So Scoble&#39;s looking for a wiki, seems to have gotten a few popular suggestions. Since he wants it hosted I can&#39;t really offer anything - I don&#39;t have the server space or sysadmin knowledge to handle something of Scoble&#39;s popularity. Despite that, can I recommend that you make the quality of the editor your most important criteria? It will make a huge difference to the adoption rate of the wiki. I&#39;ve discussed this before:&#160;Wiki Syntax Considered Harmful and Making Wikis Work. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So Scoble&#39;s looking for a wiki, seems to have gotten a few popular suggestions. Since he wants it hosted I can&#39;t really offer anything - I don&#39;t have the server space or sysadmin knowledge to handle something of Scoble&#39;s popularity. Despite that, can I recommend that you make the quality of the editor your most important criteria? It will make a huge difference to the adoption rate of the wiki. I&#39;ve discussed this before:&#160;Wiki Syntax Considered Harmful and Making Wikis Work. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
