<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keep The Markup, Improve The Editor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.symphonious.net/2007/02/08/keep-the-markup-improve-the-editor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2007/02/08/keep-the-markup-improve-the-editor/</link>
	<description>Living in a state of accord.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Symphonious &#187; More On Replacing The Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2007/02/08/keep-the-markup-improve-the-editor/#comment-58170</link>
		<dc:creator>Symphonious &#187; More On Replacing The Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symphonious.net/2007/02/08/keep-the-markup-improve-the-editor/#comment-58170</guid>
		<description>[...] January 2004       &#171; Keep The Markup, Improve The Editor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January 2004       &#171; Keep The Markup, Improve The Editor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2007/02/08/keep-the-markup-improve-the-editor/#comment-58070</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symphonious.net/2007/02/08/keep-the-markup-improve-the-editor/#comment-58070</guid>
		<description>Hey thanks for the link :-)  - the example of Maven using APT is particularly egregious because (like most things in maven), the team decide to roll yet another simplified markup language for doc creation.   Part of the reason why Maven docs are so bad is because there is no way to integrate this customer format with great tools like Ephox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey thanks for the link :-)  - the example of Maven using APT is particularly egregious because (like most things in maven), the team decide to roll yet another simplified markup language for doc creation.   Part of the reason why Maven docs are so bad is because there is no way to integrate this customer format with great tools like Ephox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimC</title>
		<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2007/02/08/keep-the-markup-improve-the-editor/#comment-57550</link>
		<dc:creator>TimC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symphonious.net/2007/02/08/keep-the-markup-improve-the-editor/#comment-57550</guid>
		<description>Actually, please don't speak for all authors.  The best way I have found of authoring scientific works is with LaTeX.  Most definitely not wysiwyg.  Fudging around with mice and equation editors is teh suck when you can simply say $\int^\inf_0 \frac{1}{x^2}= ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, please don&#8217;t speak for all authors.  The best way I have found of authoring scientific works is with LaTeX.  Most definitely not wysiwyg.  Fudging around with mice and equation editors is teh suck when you can simply say $\int^\inf_0 \frac{1}{x^2}= &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hen</title>
		<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2007/02/08/keep-the-markup-improve-the-editor/#comment-57418</link>
		<dc:creator>Hen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 07:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symphonious.net/2007/02/08/keep-the-markup-improve-the-editor/#comment-57418</guid>
		<description>People are attached to their editors and not their markup. If Maven had moved from xdocs to apt-gui for their site creation, I doubt there would have been many takers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are attached to their editors and not their markup. If Maven had moved from xdocs to apt-gui for their site creation, I doubt there would have been many takers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
