<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aim Higher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.symphonious.net/2008/06/24/aim-higher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2008/06/24/aim-higher/</link>
	<description>Living in a state of accord.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Sutton</title>
		<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2008/06/24/aim-higher/#comment-165777</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Sutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symphonious.net/?p=877#comment-165777</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it has a fair way to go before it's a useful standard, but the idea is very cool.  The URL really needs to point to either an edit page (type="text/html") or a more complete descriptor file that can then describe the content types provided and accepted, the protocols used to publish etc.

And yes, the icon is awful but that's easily fixed. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it has a fair way to go before it&#8217;s a useful standard, but the idea is very cool.  The URL really needs to point to either an edit page (type=&#8221;text/html&#8221;) or a more complete descriptor file that can then describe the content types provided and accepted, the protocols used to publish etc.</p>
<p>And yes, the icon is awful but that&#8217;s easily fixed. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Trieloff</title>
		<link>http://www.symphonious.net/2008/06/24/aim-higher/#comment-165720</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Trieloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symphonious.net/?p=877#comment-165720</guid>
		<description>Some other points I see: what do you do if the edit-URL is identical to the view-URL, because you are using PUT or POST to change the content? The mine-type is application/x-wiki, but that does not tell me what kind of editor I should expect, for instance if being able to edit the HTML directly, I think text/html would be a better mine-type. And rel="alternate" means an alternate representation of the resource, not an action on the resource. (And I do not like the icon)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some other points I see: what do you do if the edit-URL is identical to the view-URL, because you are using PUT or POST to change the content? The mine-type is application/x-wiki, but that does not tell me what kind of editor I should expect, for instance if being able to edit the HTML directly, I think text/html would be a better mine-type. And rel=&#8221;alternate&#8221; means an alternate representation of the resource, not an action on the resource. (And I do not like the icon)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
